Activity

Today
The `TestFixedbugs/issue70549.go` test recently added in [CL 662775](https://go.dev/cl/662775) is consistently failing on linux-s390x-ibm and linux-s390x-ibm-race builders: ``` --- FAIL: TestFixedbu…
CC @matloob, @samthanawalla (via [owners](https://dev.golang.org/owners)).
@qmuntal is [looking into this](https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/653856/5#message-195160c33eb703a9b3cd6740dec47a275005ac3e). CC @golang/windows.
dmitshur closed an issue cmd/vet: TestVet/stdversion failures57m
dmitshur closed an issue net/textproto: unrecognized failures58m
dmitshur closed an issue os: TestStartProcess/absolute failures59m
dmitshur reviewed +2 on doc/go1.25: document macOS requirements4h
Thanks. Trybot failure looks unrelated to the change; bypassing.
(1 comment) If this error variable is exported, isn't this change in scope of the proposal process (https://go.dev/s/proposal#scope)? If it doesn't need to be exported, then making it exported can …
Thanks.
Yesterday
Note that x/review/git-codereview.TestHooks and 5 more related tests are failing as of this change on GOOS=windows as seen on the [x/review (gotip) by go commit](https://ci.chromium.org/p/golang/g/x-…
Note that x/sys/windows.TestBuildSecurityDescriptor is failing as of this change on GOOS=windows as seen on the [x/sys (gotip) by go commit](https://ci.chromium.org/p/golang/g/x-sys-gotip-by-go/conso…
dmitshur reviewed +2 on doc/next: fix link1d
Thanks.
Last Week
(1 comment) Noting here that if [for range](https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_range) is being used, this could also be written as: ``` for i := range sa.Addr { ``` Which has the same behavior but is arg…
Can you please clarify if the request to backport to the 1.24 branch is because the problem only exists in 1.24 but not 1.23? Or does this problem affect 1.23 too? We need this information because th…
dmitshur reviewed +2 on api: move go1.25 to next/702504d
dmitshur reviewed +2 on api: move go1.25 to next/702504d
(1 comment) Noting that [normally](https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/master:doc/README.md) each proposal gets its own individual fragment file. If you're interested in updating the test to detect…
dmitshur reviewed +2 on api: move go1.25 to next/702504d
dmitshur reviewed +2 on api: move go1.25 to next/702504d
Thanks. As TestCheckAPIFragments reports, new APIs need a corresponding release note.
(1 comment) Oh, based on https://go.dev/issue/72130#issuecomment-2710961286, maybe this just needs to say "For" instead of "Fixes".
(1 comment) Issue #72130 is a proposal in 'Incoming' state. Should this CL wait for the proposal to be accepted before being submitted? Or should the issue be taken out of the proposal process?
@zpavlinovic This issue is closed as "completed", is that the right status? Or should it be closed as "not planned"?
dmitshur reviewed +2 on cmd/vet: add waitgroup analyzer5d
Thanks.
(1 comment) Thanks. It works out well since we want to update all golang.org/x dependencies regularly anyway (#36905).
(1 comment) Is this revert to v0.30.0 unintentional? If intentional, it needs to also be done for the cmd module to keep them both using the same x/sys version.
In your other comments you said "Fix applied". In order to apply that change, it does require adding a new "patch set". A patch set is what Gerrit refers to revisions, and a new one is needed to make…
Thanks. "net/http" is already listed under Security.Packages for the #72011 security fix. But "net/http" also has a bug (non-security) fix for issue #72103. Add it to the Bug.Packages list too? No…
No problem. Note there's still no patch set 2 available. If you have it as a draft, it there's a button you need to press to publish it.
Fixed via [crrev.com/c/6414930](https://crrev.com/c/6414930), which adds escaping for this character on the side of result_adapter. Filed #73116 in case there's something the go command can do bette…
Fixed via [crrev.com/c/6414930](https://crrev.com/c/6414930), which adds escaping for this character on the side of result_adapter. Filed #73116 in case there's something the go command can do bette…
This issue is meant to capture a small finding from #73086, and it's related to the cluster of proposals like #67562 (and its earlier version #45549), #27896, possibly more like #44970, #20209, #2021…
(1 comment) Did you mean to upload a new patch set, or do you mean something different by "Acknowledged"?
Thanks. ```suggestion internal/buildgo: fix use of wrong error ``` ```suggestion err has been checked, it is nil now, here should call sp.Done with remoteErr. ``` (See go.dev/wiki/CommitMessage.)
Earlier
dmitshur reviewed +2 on cmd/vet: add waitgroup analyzer1w
Thanks. This CL enables the implementation for this feature, documents it, and closes the issue in the Go1.25 milestone (via 'Fixes #18022'). That's 3 out of 4 things we need to be able to release G…
Yes, both of those approaches would work. Since the golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis/passes/waitgroup package is small (2 .go files), to me it seems fine to get it vendored in the next CL (i.e., the s…
Ready to take this step now, dropping hold.
One of Swarming Bot requirements is to have passwordless sudo reboot enabled. While here, also install unzip for x/build/cmd/racebuild, and nano for some interactive debugging convenience. For gola…
For golang/go#73086.
The x/text dashboard has turned red: https://ci.chromium.org/p/golang/g/x-text-gotip-by-go/console The text execution itself passes, but LUCI builds (for example, https://ci.chromium.org/b/87191676…
Thanks.
CC @matloob, @samthanawalla.
CC @golang/security.
Thanks. The value of `crl.Issuer.Organization` contains only one backslash character: ``` Organization:[]string{`VeriSign\`} ``` And the String method prints that one backslash in escaped format. H…
Thanks. go.dev is newer and shorter compared to golang.org. While they both work, it seems we should prefer writing down the former in new code and documentation. ```suggestion // Before implementi…
Hold for now. This is meant to be submitted later, after we're done iterating on the image and ready to proceed.
> What is that subset? As noted at https://staticcheck.dev/docs/configuration/, "Staticcheck tries to provide a good out-of-the-box experience, [...]", that is, this question is already being consid…
This change is ready for review.
For golang/go#72030.
For golang/go#72030.
For golang/go#72030.
CC @golang/vulndb.
CC @golang/security.
CC @golang/security.
In the issue report you mention "I use Go to parse this CRL file, Go interprets". Can you please provide a snippet of code for that? In particular, that code will help determine if the problem is in …
@JunyangShao Since you authored the original CL, would you like to create the cherry-pick CL for it too? The process is documented at https://go.dev/wiki/MinorReleases#making-cherry-pick-cls. Thanks.
CC @golang/security.
@neild Both this issue (#72954) and issue #72140 say: > This is a regression in 1.24 caused by CL 637939 for #35892. And they both request a backport to 1.24, but as far I can tell, CL 637939 is on…
To clarify, is it intentional that the test2json line would exclude remaining TestEvent fields like "Time", "Package" (in contrast to https://github.com/golang/go/issues/71287#issuecomment-2737759645…
FreeBSD 12.3 is EOL'ed as noted in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/61095#issuecomment-2334940821. We ended up adding a newer FreeBSD 14.1 as part of that issue, so there's nothing more to do for …
It was possible to successfully build the image, and its swarming bot client successfully connects with `cipd_platform:openbsd-386`: https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/botlist?f=cipd_platform%3Aopen…
The flakes in #54461 seem to happen on OpenBSD 7.2 builders only. [CL 654676](https://go.dev/cl/654676) replaces the previous OpenBSD 7.2 builders with the new 7.6 ones, so those those will go away. …
The builder is currently operational. Thanks for resolving this @bsiegert. Closing.
The builder is currently operational. Thanks for resolving this. Closing.
The builder is currently operational. Thanks for resolving this @n2vi. Closing.
This bot doesn't exist now. It existed briefly (see https://github.com/golang/go/issues/67299#issuecomment-2276610972) but has since been deleted because its cipd_platform was incorrectly computed. …
Fixed alongside #72851.
CC @golang/release. Fixed alongside #72851.
Fixed alongside #72851.
Fixed alongside #72851.
dmitshur deleted branch in rsc.io/rf3w
drop-go116
dmitshur pushed to main in rsc.io/rf3w
c71790db15004dd523d532f6a7daa6f12b3b81f6git-generate: modernize slightly
Thanks.